Return to Home Page
Need Help? Ask a Librarian

Tutorial Contents
Introduction
  Objectives
  What is PubMed?
  Connect to PubMed
  Sample PubMed Record
Basic Searches
Find More
Find Less
Select & Download
Find Full Articles
Case Study

Go to PubMed

HSL Home

Introduction

Objectives

Welcome! This tutorial is designed to help you improve your PubMed searching skills.

It covers:

  • constructing basic searches;
  • revising searches to find more of the relevant literature;
  • focusing search results using Limits;
  • selecting and downloading PubMed article references
  • finding the complete article online or in print

What is PubMed?

PubMed is a free web based interface for searching MEDLINE
  • PubMed is created and maintained by the National Library of Medicine.
  • Covers journal articles in medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, and preclinical sciences.
  • Contains Pubmed records, many with detailed abstracts, that provide location information for journal articles published in 5,200 journals in 30 languages. Coverage dates back to 1950.
  • Does not include information about meeting abstracts, conference proceedings, dissertations, patents, or websites.
  • NLM indexers add words called Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to each article record. Searching with MeSH words can improve results.
  • Links to full-text articles on some publishers's websites, but may require access through library subscriptions for viewing.

Connect to PubMed

UNC Chapel Hill students, faculty and staff should connect to PubMed using a link on a UNC Chapel Hill website in order to see to information about content available from campus libraries.

On the UNC Dentistry homepage go to 'Quick Links' at the bottom of the page and select Library Resources.

Library Resources from Quick Links on Dentistry Homepage

Then select the link to PubMed.

PubMed Link on Dentistry Library Resources page


Sample PubMed Record

PubMed contains information about journal articles. When you search PubMed you are searching this information, not the full-text of the article.

Here are the pieces of information that make up a PubMed record.

Journal Title Abbreviation: Date;Vol #
(Issue #):
Page #s

Dent Traumatol.
2007 Feb;23
(1):
14-20.
Link to comments Comment in:
Dent Traumatol. 2007 Aug;23(4):262; author reply 262-3.
Link to library access Find at UNC button
Title of the article Effectiveness of mouthguards in reducing neurocognitive deficits following sports-related cerebral concussion.
Author names Mihalik JP, McCaffrey MA, Rivera EM, Pardini JE, Guskiewicz KM, Collins MW, Lovell MR.
First author's institutional affiliation Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. jasonm@unc.edu
Detailed abstract Although it is widely accepted that mouthguards decrease the incidence of dental injuries, there is a controversy among sports medicine professionals as to the effectiveness of mouthguards in decreasing the incidence or severity of sports-related cerebral concussion (SRCC). While some experimental data suggest that this may be the case, there exist a number of reports suggesting that mouthguards do not serve this purpose. These conclusions have been drawn, however, without actually measuring the extent of neurocognitive dysfunction in athletes following sports-related concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether mouthguard use reduces the neurocognitive and symptomatic impairments that follow an injurious episode of SRCC. Preseason baseline data were collected as part of an ongoing clinical program that uses a computerized neurocognitive test to assess various faculties of brain function and symptoms reported at the time of testing. Follow-up testing from 180 student-athletes who had sustained an SRCC was analyzed for the purpose of this study. These athletes were separated into one of two groups: those who reported using mouthguards and those who did not. Neurocognitive testing was accomplished using the Immediate Post-Concussion and Assessment Test (ImPACT). Results suggest that neurocognitive deficits at the time of the athletes' first follow-up assessment did not differ between mouthguard users and non-users, suggesting that mouthguard use does little to reduce the severity of neurocognitive dysfunction and onset of symptoms following sports-related head trauma. However, an interesting finding in this study was that athletes experienced significantly lower neurocognitive test scores and reported higher symptom scores following SRCC regardless of mouthguard use. This emphasizes a thorough clinical evaluation of athletes that have sustained an SRCC. Although it was found in this study that mouthguard use does not decrease the severity of concussion, it is important to note that the use of mouthguards is paramount in reducing maxillofacial and dental trauma and their use should continue to be mandated by athletic associations and supported by all dental and sports medicine professionals.
Publication Types Evaluation Studies
MeSH Terms
  • Adolescent
  • Athletic Injuries/complications
  • Athletic Injuries/prevention & control*
  • Brain Concussion/complications
  • Brain Concussion/diagnosis
  • Brain Concussion/prevention & control*
  • Cognition Disorders/etiology
  • Cognition Disorders/prevention & control*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mouth Protectors*
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Severity of Illness Index
Unique Identifier PMID: 17227375 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Tutorial Contents       Basic Searches